Time is an essential part of my creative process. Obviously, it takes a central part in my rhythm construction. Time, in my work, is revealed by motion, sound or anything else that produce duration or have a duration feel. That’s what I do: I play with duration that engage myself into a sense of time. Involving Nature helps me realize that an important notion into being in a living place is how the aspect of “when” hook me. When is about relation. In Nature, wind, snow, rain, wildlife, etc. have specific rhythm. Those rhythms appear to be interrelated when I start to observe them. It’s a complex ecosystem where everyone seems to know when to be active or when it is time to listen to others. This makes a true shared place. Birds don’t sing at certain moments of the day (and seem to change their song…), letting the ear perceive the crickets, which let us absorb the evening duration. It’s the complexity of those relations that make Nature observation so beautiful for me. Seeing the same place going somewhere else by those transformations is magical and fluid. It’s like Nature giving us clues to anticipate what is coming up.
Although, this “when” thing is a puzzle for me because, it’s not something that is determined. It’s a relation but also a transformation (but only in the big picture. Individuality still exists.). It’s not a Q&A. It’s not a polyrhythm. It’s somewhere between hazard and responding to something. It's respect for the shared space.
As a professional artist (doing art for a living), time is a non-finite resource. It’s something I need to grab to be efficient and productive. That’s how capitalism inducts me to see time. I’m kind of obsessed with the elasticity of time, using it as much as possible. I’m stretching my time to get more and more opportunities to do something. As a result, my dance is most of the time active and stay on a regular and repetitive rhythm. For a couple of years, I’m working hard to get out of this steady rhythm. For now, I can handle different actions to create rhythmic layers, but still: time stay linear in my way to embody it. I stay in the big picture instead of surfing into those multiple cycles that I created. To be more specific, the “when” doesn’t appear relevant here. The relation is fixed instead of being fluent. There is no shared space, but a place “we” already know.
In Nature, time elasticity still appear, but instead of seeing a linear global activity which needs time to perceive in this gigantic context, I’m kind of forced to see each cycle before seeing the big picture. Giving myself access to rhythms with active and passive parts. And I feel there are some “clues” about this “when” things in those passive moments. Nature doesn’t feel the urge to answer or to say: “I’m here, I’m present.” Being alive isn’t about taking centre stage or to be “active”. It is just about being somewhere.
In this creative process, I engage into observation time, active or dancing time, research time, etc. And sometimes, I just rest. I’m trying to be passive and let’s the other ingredients of the creation (know and unknown) appear and involve into process…
And it’s not just a way to get more efficient after this “break”. No, it’s just a way to integrate another way to see time. I need to have those passive states to integrate this natural rhythm of active and passive parts into my creative process (and my life!) To push against a capitalist’s way to see time.
It’s helping me to give space to what I really want to present.
When I’m moving all the time, I don’t give space to those things: it start to be about me—which I don’t want.
I need to be a window of the world I want to present. Tempo will be my next step into this research. How Nature affects my “tempo”.
Starting with my heartbeat and my breath.